世界互联网大会乌镇峰会“求新”“求先”“求变” 取得丰富成果******
光明网讯（记者 李飞）11月11日，2022年世界互联网大会乌镇峰会新闻发布会在浙江乌镇互联网国际会展中心举行。中共浙江省委常委、宣传部部长王纲表示，本次大会，坚持体制机制求新、议题设置求先、活动策划求变，在丰富内容特色、提升参会体验、放大溢出效应等方面全方位释放增量，取得了丰富的成果。
一是闪耀了数字文明的思想光芒。在本次峰会和各类论坛上，许多新理念新模式在交流交融交锋中孕育而生，不断赋予互联网发展以新的生机和活力。比如，本届浙江分论坛以“工业互联网的创新与突破”为导向，以“数字化赋能产业链重构”为核心议题，邀请了国内外工业互联网领域知名专家、企业家等600余人齐聚一堂、开展交流、碰撞思想，为全球制造业未来发展路径贡献了新思想、新观点、新路径。
二是诠释了数字时代的浙江精彩。本次峰会创新设立三项“永久举办地”特色活动，集中展示浙江运用互联网创造共同富裕新图景的生动实践，生动展现浙江数字经济高质量发展的靓丽成果。数字经济产业合作大会，搭建项目、资本、园区三方互动交流合作平台，36个技术含量高、市场前景好、补链强链延链的重点项目完成现场签约，投资金额共计746亿元。
三是呈现了数字变革的硬核成果。本次峰会成功举办了“互联网之光”博览会，吸引了40个国家和地区的415家中外企业参展，组织开展了74场新产品新技术发布活动，之江实验室智能计算数字反应堆、卡巴斯基反无人机入侵系统等“黑科技”悉数亮相。首次开设“互联网之光云展厅”，利用3D、虚拟现实技术，打造沉浸式、365天不落幕“线上云展”，在线参观超过50万余次。“直通乌镇”全球互联网大赛吸引了来自海内外24个国家的1110个项目参赛。
四是提振了数字经济的产业动能。本次峰会专题发布10个历年签约优秀合作项目，其中桐乡“乌镇之光”超算中心、绍兴集成电路先进封装生产线、金华龙芯智慧产业园等已成为数字经济的标杆，产生了很好的示范引领和辐射带动作用。升级打造的人才相亲会品牌，以云聘会、产业人才发展大会等形式，为1074家单位发布3.8万余个岗位需求，共吸引了25万名各类人才前来应聘，进一步拓宽了数字经济人才供需对接的“桥梁”。
五是升级了数字智能的参会体验。本次峰会坚持高质量办好峰会的理念，推动服务智慧化、体验智慧化全面升级，开发了“乌镇峰会一站通”小程序，迭代升级“浙里安保智控·乌镇”数字安保应用，一站式服务、无感化验证通行、智能预警等数智体验在乌镇随处可见。
“置身新时代新征程新起点，浙江将以更加开放的姿态、更加宽阔的视野、更加务实的精神，紧扣互联网变革发展的脉动，奋力打造全球数字变革高地，与各方一道共创美好数字未来。” 王纲表示。
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
| 168彩票地图 |
